| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
109
|
Posted - 2011.09.28 21:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
We all know it goes on. We all ***** and complain and moan about it. But THIS drew my ire.
GoonSwarm Federation Alliance Update GÇô September 28th
Quote:Blue-On-Blue Violence
This is a sensitive GÇô even a touchy GÇô subject, so let me say that while he is, indeed, a keen ratter GÇô a very keen ratter if we are honest GÇô we have one rule in Goonswarm: we donGÇÖt **** other goons. Oh and we donGÇÖt play cop for CCP in their own game by reporting or petitioning goons, either:
But if it were the case that he had been ratting just a little too exuberantly for peoplesGÇÖ liking, or if he had offended them by consistently ignoring their conversation requests for a brief window of, say, seventeen or eighteen hours, for instance, then it would be goon-****** to report him or to kill him. This will land you and your corp in trouble as all we know is that someone shot blues.
So at what point does an alliance, with it's head as THE CSM CHAIRMAN, allow bots, WHICH IS AGAINST THE EULA, and ACTIVELY THREATEN MEMBERS WITH EXPULSION if they should report said bots.
I know for a fact that several corps/alliances have a zero tolerance for bots, including a DekCo kiss buddy alliance called FA. Hoorah to Zag for that!
But for Goons to threaten expulsion flies directly in the face of the EULA. Surely even encouraging/harbouring such activity must be embedded into the EULA immediately. NO-ONE should have ANY tolerance for bots let alone SUPPORT them.
I call on CCP to start banning CORPS and ALLIANCES for ACTIVELY ENCOURAGING botting, knowingly and in the face of it being downright illegal ingame.
And for the sensible Goons (are there any?), if you think you can be threatened with expulsion for bot-reporting, just remember that no CEO will know, or can know, if you reported the cheating, thieving SOB!! Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.28 22:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:I missed the part where it said "Don't report bots." Can you bold it for me? So if you're under the impression that this is NOT being said (which it clearly does), then please, report all your bots, you'll be fine won't you? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
110
|
Posted - 2011.09.28 22:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Quote:No where in your "quote" is any one actively encouraging or promoting botting. BTW the "leaked" version of that I have seen then goes on to provide the direction that members of that alliance should take to sort out the problem -> report suspects to diplomatic team and let alliance sort it out. You are intentionally taking things out of context to cause drama which raises the question: Let me clarify my position. It IS NOT a corp/alliance issue to determine if bots should/should not be reported. Botting is in direct violation of the EULA and as such ANY INDIVIDUAL MEMBER has the right, without threat of "retaliation", to report said bot.
To threaten expulsion (which is PLAINLY implied if not stated) for reporting blues is also NOT a corp/alliance issue.
Quote:I must have missed that part in the EULA that says alliances have to enforce CCP`s laws. Which is exactly my point above. But nor is the corp/alliance responsibly to tell players/members how to handle bots either.
Aliiances and corps either actively engage a policy to destroy suspected bots (I mean, you can shoot anybody for no reason) or they can "turn a blind eye" which I have no problem with as long as members can report as they see fit.
It's the implication of expulsion for reporting (which I repeat is CLEARLY IMPLIED) that is sooooo wrong! That IS NOT an alliance or corp call to make. Period. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
113
|
Posted - 2011.09.28 22:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:Mara Tessidar wrote:I missed the part where it said "Don't report bots." Can you bold it for me? You don't read contracts when you sign them, do you? ........ You've got to learn to read between the lines, otherwise you're a f*$king lemming. Have no fear. He knows EXACTLY what my post states. Anyone saying the post is not threatening expulsion for reporting bots is obfuscating the posts intent.
It's just their way to dumb down the topic. Troll 101
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
113
|
Posted - 2011.09.28 23:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Quantessa wrote:I don't support botting.
I don't have any issue though with an Alliance declaring rules of not grassing up people for doing it. Other players can do it, Gms can try to detect it and so on.
In real life if I park on a yellow line it's a fair cop if I get caught but I'd find it completely unacceptable if a mate called the Feds to grass me up.
Outlawing the practice of informing on people is not the same as legalising a practice.
And if you don't like Goon CSMs vote for someone else and encourage others to do likewise. I'm surprised by the number of taking-it-out-of-context posts on this.
Here's what I said in TL;DR form. Whether you do/don't report bots is up to the individual. Whether an alliance/corp does/does not report or act against bots is up to them too.
But to threaten expulsion if you DO report is a totally different issue. That is NOT for a corp/alliance to say. EVER.
And I'll live with "legalising" is not the same as "outlawing reporting". Fair point.
I should have used "Botting is ratified (pun intended), supported, encouraged and protected by Goons OR ELSE"..... Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
113
|
Posted - 2011.09.28 23:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Naglfar Nidhoggur wrote:If Goon A report's Goon B's botting activity and KEEPS HIS MOUTH SHUT then how does anyone know that he reported Goon B?
Quote:And for the sensible Goons (are there any?), if you think you can be threatened with expulsion for bot-reporting, just remember that no CEO will know, or can know, if you reported the cheating, thieving SOB!!
QFT Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
114
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 00:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
Quote: I think CCP should take rules against botting further:
If you know about someone botting, and there is evidence to prove which you knew but never acted - you're also up for the same ban as the person whom was actualy using the bot.
in real life, if you know someone who held up a bank or a grocery store and you do not let the authorities know, you're guilty by association.
Eve is real, right? so lets get with the real punishment that needs to be dished out to the real arrogant wankers that think they're above/beyond eve's T&C/EULA. Tho, that would require CCP to grow a pair, which i realy dont think will happen any time soon.
Bingo. Someone gets it.
This pro-bot "laugh-in-your-face" stance by Goons needs to be hard-lined by CCP. Right now.
The Goons on the CSM, OUR ELECTED (apparently) player representatives, need to be booted out. Period. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
114
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 00:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
Quote:Corporations can do literally anything that is not against the EULA. That includes telling their members how to conduct themselves if they wish to remain a part of the corp. No. I do not subscribe to this. The EULA is OUTSIDE of a corp/alliances responsibility.
Quote:Now, botting is against the EULA. However, failing to report someone for botting is not. Therefore, it is entirely within a corporation or alliances rights to demand that its members not report bots. If the members have a problem with it, the solution is simple: Leave the corp. The EULA must be a non-negotiable. If you do not agree with that then my words are wasted on explanation.
But condoning, promoting, securing and actively (and publically) protecting any activity that deliberately BREACHES the EULA as ALLIANCE POLICY must be stomped on. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
Quote:Your tears are delicious.
In a game where everyone bots; the only thing left to do is bot. Seriously, the onus is on CCP to fix the game, not the players. Man, you're right. I'm crying my eyes out!!
It's because I am laughing SOOOOOO hard at your "CCP should fix this" comment. How quaint.
You know, people that think botting is stoppable by code are seriously kidding themselves, and I mean seriously kidding themselves.
Botting can only be stopped by players actively reporting them. It's YOUR game being ruined.
This is the issue at hand. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:A point the Op needs to take on board:
This is essentially the alliance saying: don't shoot your mouth off, don't cause internal ructions that damage us all, pass to the diplomats who will sort it out. While you may disagree with that, CCP have set a precedent, if they see that the Goons directors are doing their bit to limit the rule breaking they will be happy.
Fair comment and point is taken on board.
Except....
I'm not talking about blue shootings am I?
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah waaaah waaaah waaaah waaaah waaaah waaaah ..........
the **** should i care. Cared enough to tell us you don't care. Much appreciated.
As you were.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:The Apostle wrote:Jita Alt666 wrote:A point the Op needs to take on board:
This is essentially the alliance saying: don't shoot your mouth off, don't cause internal ructions that damage us all, pass to the diplomats who will sort it out. While you may disagree with that, CCP have set a precedent, if they see that the Goons directors are doing their bit to limit the rule breaking they will be happy. Fair comment and point is taken on board. Except.... I'm not talking about blue shootings am I? shoot your mouth off, does not mean shooting with lasers... Hey. Yer. Fair point again.
Except....
"don't cause internal ructions that damage us all" How? Reporting is anom and it's not discussed by CCP. Dare me to say Goons need to control who is/isn't reported? Why?
Either way, it's NOT their call. Ever.
As soon as any player reports a bot to another player he has removed the anonymity assured by reporting directly to CCP. Hence my absolute conviction that the process of reporting/not reporting bots is NOT and nor should it be, an alliance issue.
CCP need to make this very, very clear.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Source? I'm not doubting you, it'd just take someone INCREDIBLY THICK to post an alliance update which condones botting that obviously. They did and it's legit.
Got access to Goon forums? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Quote:As far as the bit that states if you report any member of GSF for botting you will be kicked. Well all things considered, that in of itself is actually within their rights. (CCP does not enforce corp or alliances rules in regaurds to recruiting or removal of members) As for the rest, well that is up to CCP. So you are fine that deliberate, publicised condoning of EULA breaches is kosher and any act to report said EULA breach will get you booted?
Quote: All things considered if the OP was really concerned they should have sent the message to CCP under a petition and let them figure it out.
I seriously hope they do! The source is a matter of public record. As OP what I want to know is whether this is a clear and deliberate condoning and protection of players that breach the EULA.
This forum has been done to death regardng bots and the oppostion to it is pronounced and unequivocable. To encourage EULA breaches from an alliance that has CSM members smacks of hypocrisy and tells every player that botting is fine - Mittani's boys said so and CCP did nought about it!
Quote:To that I say TROLL........ To that I say LOL
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
115
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Quote:Notice even how he was carefull enough not to make any direct mention to botting whatsoever. Dude understands the legal system and he does his best to bend the rules thats why people call him a jerk. He bends, but he doesn't breaks.. so anyone who complains is just doing useless whining because nothing is going to be done about it. Very true. The wording makes it very easy to mitigate the intent of the content. And many here are trying to do exactly that. Go figure.
Quote:To the OP. C'est la vie. Yeah. I know. [sad panda face] Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
116
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 01:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
Quote:There is nothing on the EULA that states that i am required to report a bot when i see one and there never will be because recognizing a BOT is by default done entirely by the use of circumstantial evidence. So you cannot punish me because i haven't reported someone who i can't prove with 100% certainty is a bot. No. And I have said this. Whether to report/not report is up to the individual. Being told not to report is an entirely different matter.
Quote:And since nobody is OBLIGED to report a bot, they can't punish anyone from strongly suggesting that someone else under his command doesnt do it either. Reporting a bot is your right? Well, so is speaking in local chat... and nobody does jackshit about alliance leaders who kick members for speaking in local chat. Except that talking in local chat is allowed under the EULA.
Botting is not.
To TL;DR my entire rant. I am asking that CCP consider making the promotion/protection/condoning of botting as a breach of the EULA. To attempt to circumvent the individuals bot reporting rights in the interests of any corp/alliance (not just Goons) must be deemed as inappropriate and bannable.
The EULA is a contract between you and CCP. Not with the alliance/corp the member is in. An alliance cannot and should not promote/encourage breaches of the EULA. It is not in their domain.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
116
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 02:31:00 -
[17] - Quote
Quote:In a sense, players ARE obligated to report botting. Just because there is no threat to players who spot a bot and not report it doesn't mean it's OK to not report bots. And this is why the reporting of bots must be kept inviolate from alliance/corp policy and alliance/corps attempting to interfere in reporting/non-reporting of EULA breaches should also be guilty as charged.
(and I know personally that CCP has set a precedent on this - unfortunately I cannot discuss how I know).
Quote:Moving on from that, has there been any bot banned at all from no petition raised about it?
Has CCP banned bots from no leads what so ever? Think about it. Well, we simply wouldn't know would we? And this point has been raised. If CCP actively do a "name and shame" of bots then we'd all be the better placated. If it's seen to be getting addressed, regularly and with quotable ban details/numbers.... Hmmm. I wish.
But it still flies in the face of even bothering to stop bots when large alliances decide to publically advocate and protect botting. For it to be from an alliance where it's head is also the CSM head.... Shameful. (I accept they are not the only ones botting, what I don't accept is how they reportedly deal/not deal with it "inhouse".)
That is clearly sending the wrong message, in and out of game. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
117
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:TL;DR OP selectively cannibalized what Endie said in his announcement to try and smear goons
"Blue-On-Blue Violence
One of our illustrious members (let's call him "Ibertizzle") keeps losing Tengus to Russians and French people. This is a sensitive - even a touchy - subject, so let me say that while he is, indeed, a keen ratter - a very keen ratter if we are honest - we have one rule in Goonswarm: we don't **** other goons. Oh and we don't play cop for CCP in their own game by reporting or petitioning goons, either: that's Darius Johnson's job. So two rules. And there's the one about how nobody mentions the Mittani's occasional chin tuft; and the localised No Digis or DBRBs rules. I could go on. Ok, on reflection we live in a hidebound and overly legislated nanny state. But we definitely don't **** goons. Now I know that "Ibertizzle" has probably just been insulting people constantly in local and challenging them to 1 v 7s at the sun. Which is fine: honour demanded that he repeatedly die for his offences.
But if it were the case that he had been ratting just a little too exuberantly for peoples' liking, or if he had offended them by consistently ignoring their conversation requests for a brief window of, say, seventeen or eighteen hours, for instance, then it would be goon-******* to report him or to kill him. This will land you and your corp in trouble as all we know is that someone shot blues. And by allowing one, well-justified blue-shooting case to go unpunished we basically open the portal to a hellish other-dimension of horror and chaos which ends with "hilariously" wrecked amok freighters on the VFK undock. Which sounds good but involves a lot of paperwork.
The correct approach is to speak to your CEO, who will submit form 240a together with the mandatory handling fee of 150 million ISK to the overworked diplomacy team, who will curse me loudly for putting that in there then go about finding a solution. Trust me: they have his number on speed-dial by now."
So which bit didn't get quoted and which bit "exonerates" the Goons.
Now go back and tell me in a "TL;DR" what I'm requesting?
bah. Forget it. Just noticed you're a Goon. Nuff said..... Give Mittens a kiss for me yeah? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
117
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 03:25:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mara Tessidar wrote:You just noticed I have "Goonswarm Federation" under my name? Yes. I generally do not judge a persons commentary by who they are in game so I do not look.
In your case, given the response, I did.
Players may be tethered by alliance/corp policy in-game, they are not tethered out-of-game because of alt posting.
You on the other hand cannot agreee with me in public even if you did agree with me - wearing your Goon badge precludes your objectivity. i.e. It's a waste of time trying to argue the point with you.
I'm not after more Goon opinion/rhetoric, I'm after opinion from NOT Goons. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
118
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Quote:I dont bot, nor do I support it, but is it every ******* corp or alliance's job to police this game?
No. It's CCP's.
That's all I get from the statement in the OP. Lol. To be expected.
What I said is that it's is NOT the alliance/corps job to police the game. The EULA is a contract between CCP and the individual and for an alliance/corp to dictate how the reporting of EULA breaches are handled is way outside the scope of the alliance/corp.
Let me put it this way, if an alliance (as a whole) was given a 1 week ban for knowingly harbouring/supporting a botter, how fast would the alliance say IT'S NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY!!!
And yet, same alliance has taken it upon themselves to dictate EULA breach policy to it's members. So is it an alliance responsibility or not?
Either they are responsible for bot reporting/management and must pay the penalty (as an alliance) if caught or they are not and must allow the individual do their thing without fear of retribution due to corp policy if they do.
Can't have it both ways.
I just want to see bots out of game. I also want to see blatant promotion of bots and the idea that it's not our problem removed too!
It IS our problem and CSM members of all people should be leading the charge - not laughing at it. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
118
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
Quote:Test alliance does the same thing, one time a old corp mate of mine found a botter and killed him... it turned out to be leetcheese, a military director of test at the time, someone also reported him... which resulted in the guy loosing about... idk 5-15 bil...
Regardless to say, test forced the corp to kick him...
So yeah, its common practice within that coalition that your not allowed to kill or report botters if they are blue Speaking of DekCO, FA has a clear policy of killing bots and I've seen them do it.
They do not have a policy on whether members can report/not report. Nor does Test.
"Common practise" versus "shouting it out and enforcing no-reporting in public" are 2 different things.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
118
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
Quote:Yes, what is Fatal Ascention doing about Dec Co's bots? Ignoring them i bet. QFT.
FA spends a lot of time in Goon space and Zagdul is not going to **** off Mittens by killing his bots regardless of his personal beliefs (which I do not think have changed).
Their policy as best I've seen, is enforced only in FA space. The policy of kill/not kill is not shared across DekCo. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 04:51:00 -
[23] - Quote
Quote:Do I really need to link false dichotomy here? Really? Yes you do. Read it. There is no dichotomy let alone a false one.
I have presented several points on this topic. But it comes down to the one fundamental question.
WHY do Goons need to have their own bots reported to the heirarchy? Why can't an ordinary Goon report a bot he finds without threat of expulsion? Why, given that it can be done anonymously anyway, is it even declared as policy?
Somebody in Goons hates bots, has acted and now Goons are all over it. Why?
Quote:There's nothing in the EULA or TOS saying that you can't tell others not to report rulebreakers, or that you can't punish people who do. So an absence of law makes it right?
Read my posts again (after you read the Dichotomy wiki).
I am ASKING for it to be included in the EULA and this is the perfect reason it should be. CCP needs to clarify a position here. Goons may have said "report to us and we'll deal". They said "don't report to CCP". Why?
It's sending the wrong message? Join Goons and you won't get reported to CCP but Mittens will decide your fate if he so choses!
Which might bring us to "A Dichotomy" if there is one.
Is an alliance (if they declare a policy of "report to diplo") now considered responsible for bots? If so then the alliance takes a hit if they're found with bots.
Or they are not responsible and must remain so. Leave it to the player report feature and CCP. Don't interfere in the process. Simple. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 05:32:00 -
[24] - Quote
Quote:Alliances are not responsible for the actions of an individual. Correct.
Except Goons HAVE assumed responsibility by saying "Thou shalt only report to thy leadership". Since when did Goons (or anyone) start accepting responsibility for actions against EULA violations?
They are VERY quick to say it's CCP's problem ("we're not cops for CCP") but disallow CCP intervention as a policy. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
119
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 06:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
Quote:Wrong A person or persons in the Goon leadership have stated, not the alliance. And once again it comes down to I am telling you go jump off that bridge. My response is, that is nice you first. Errrmmm.... Which definition of "leadership" have you used?
Quote:Now if player (A) reported player (B) for botting to director (C) Can any of the above be banned. NO Correct, but what are the consequences for Player A if Player B is good friend (or even the alt) of Director C?
Quote:IT is all talk, and nothing more. CCP makes the determination if a person is a Botter not the players. Aha..... You go it.
So should Goons be publically declaring that their players must tell ONLY alliance leadership about bots when they categorically state it's NOT up to the Goons to "police for CCP"?
We must either accept that Goons are a loyal little bunch and a blind bunch of non-thinking sheep or that they are in fact capable of making their own decisions.
Is Goons leadership assuming the former and to hell with what CCP think? (Read: We make our own rules. Comply peons!)
Or are they hoping to put the skids on the latter to get CCP off the botters backs? (Read: We're copping some flak from CCP about the number of bots reported guys, just go quiet for awhile please...)
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
121
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 06:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
Quote:Anyway, ... Argueing with stupid sheep makes you look stupid too, so please stop.
Yours sincerely, Daddy. ^^ Advice noticed Dad...
Quote:Edit: We've got Kangaroos in Sch+¦nbrunn. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sch+¦nbrunn_Zoo) Woot. Can I have one for my birthday? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
137
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 22:47:00 -
[27] - Quote
OK. I'm out of bed and I see this post has gone on a bit longer than I expected. Some of the reactions are sad but expected. I also understand the bias appearing. I need it back on track. This is obviously a hot item and I'd like to see something good come of it.
Can we get a TL;DR'd by a CSM/Goon and CCP Screegs.
There are 2 areas I need clarified.
A) From CSM Vile Rat - Goon
Quote:Asking a playerbase to police EULA infractions is dumb and it is not our place. There is a report bot mechanism, we encourage people to use it. First you're saying that it is NOT up to the playerbase. So why bother declaring a policy asking members to report botting ONLY to diplos?
Then you state you encourage reporting. Well look. This has clearly been refuted. I am not going to quote/quote/quote this to infinity. Goons clearly state that reporting is Goon****ing and will neccessitate a boot. Even if this is "refuted" with clever wordplay it clearly does NOT encourage reporting.
I understand not shooting blue-on-blue. Goons/anyone have every right to discourage that practise. That part is not at issue.
So short version. i) If you don't care about bots why have a policy AT ALL? ii) Why did the OP specifically state that REPORTING bots is Goon****ing if you ENCOURAGE reporting?
B) To CCP Screegs "If evidence" please report bla bla. We all know that 99% of 0.0, and specifically around Goontown is a no go zone to any bot hunters. How is this evidence to be determined? ONLY way I see is proactive CCP intervention or by alliance members reporting?
For CCP to be proactive, I understand how difficult and costly it is to track bots so I accept it's a difficult task for CCP despite the naysayers.
What I don't get is how you point-blank refuse to acknowledge the intent of the OP (in fact you go so far as to belittle the intent of this topic which I take exception to).
I completely understand the need to remain objective and not being swayed on internet topics but the content and intent of the OP is very specific. I'm ignoring how it has been discussed, heated or otherwise.
What I need (or we?) 1) Someone in CCP needs to categorically clarify the rules where an alliance has said their members CANNOT report a bot.
I have personally been in trouble for threatening to use the petioning system. I suspect that threatening to prevent use of the petition is just as (if not more so) damaging to the integrity and intent of said system
2) Someone in CCP needs to categorically clarify the rules where corps/alliances harbour/secure bottting and deliberately obfuscate attempts by members to report said bots.
It is this very public declaration of intent by an alliance (heavily CSM orientated) that sends an absolute and definitively bad message to everyone, in AND out of game. THAT is the part that needs to be addressed. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 23:24:00 -
[28] - Quote
Quote:You need to let this go. This topic would have gone alot farther and been alot more productive if you would have not pointed fingers. Even your title is set up to inflame, you could have said 0.0 Alliance "legalising" Botting!!
Nobody is argueing that what was done was questionable. But that is CCP's call on what to do about it and if it is bannable. You need to report it and move on.
Yes of course.
Except that this topic has over 200 replies and nearly 3000 views. Attempts have been made to repeatedly dumb it down and dissipate the topic at hand.
And yet the question still remains....
Should the Goons (or ANY alliance) be allowed to
1) Threaten players for reporting? 2) Even address the issue of reporting bots internally when the EULA is CCP v Individual. 3) Knowingly harbour/support and secure ground for bots?
And CCP has not clarified the position on ALLIANCE intervention and involvement in EULA issues.
btw: I could give 100 analogies where refusing to acknowledge/address/act/report or indeed to participate in an illegal activity is deemed as legalising by proxy - it's perception based. My title stands. I have also explained my title in an earlier post. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.29 23:36:00 -
[29] - Quote
Way to go Goons. Forum bots as well now? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 00:14:00 -
[30] - Quote
Quote:Hey OP, you're asking for an unenforceable rule. It's like the "no running" rule in elementary school. Actually I don't think it is unenforceable at all.
Here's the logic.
Disregarding what can currently occur under the EULA add this one simple line...
>>> Alliance/corp is fined for EVERY bot detected, escalating on subsequent offenses.
The justification for this is where an alliance/corp has ASSUMED RESPONSIBILITY or PROVIDED A HAVEN for bots then they must also be HELD ACCOUNTABLE for bots.
Either the alliance gets VERY proactive against bots or it's going to hurt.
..oo00oo..
btw: You Goon guys have been very active in this thread and I really do appreciate you dropping by. If you're doing anything, your're proving Mittani's sheep theory. Keep up the good work. Post stays high on the list too. Win/Win Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 00:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
Quote:Great idea A+++. Gonna put my bots in hostile alliances just to get reported before they catch me. It's a BRILLIANT idea.....
All large alliances broken from within. Recruting now done properly making it less of a numbers game. Bots stopped.
What more could I ask for? Yes indeed. Bring it on.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 00:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Quote:Apostle, did you get scammed by goons? In all seriousness I cant understand your hatred for goonswarm.
We love you. You guys wouldn't be clever enough to scam me. And for the record, I don't hate the Goons at all. I've flown with you guys on ops and spent quite awhile in DekCo land. (hey I'm posting on an alt, deal with it.)
But I despise players/corps/alliance who deliberately subvert the spirit of the game with cheap politics, cheap antics and cheap shots that harm the game and the people within it.
All for what? More space? Cheap thrills? Lolz and Gigglez?
And hey. I'm flattered that "The Mittani" has sent his henchman to punch my post silly. Just let him know that he's proving HIS and MY social experiment...  Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 01:31:00 -
[33] - Quote
Quote:What we don't want is witch hunts, goon on goon trolling, and drama queens going around threatening to get people banned, or bragging about getting people banned. That creates hard feelings and tears apart alliance cohesion. So reporting falls under the "no goonfucking" rules, so that when people do it they will do it quietly. No drama. BS. The OP from Goons did not state "do it quietly".
It said "don't or else"!
This is a clear and intentional intervention in EULA breaches as an alliance policy. I'm asking that it gets nailed by CCP. Always have.
However, if CCP thinks this is acceptable then CCP need to ensure that if an alliance assumes responsibility for bots it must also be held accountable for bots.
As an aside, several Goons have waxed lyrically about how you deal with bots at the same time saying that "it's not our problem".
So why the need at all to implement threats to the membership?
Why so much interest in the topic?
Have I really pissed someone off that much? (maybe I'd make a great Goon??)
I take no solice, I think it's just sad that Goons have to do what they're doing to sabotage this topic. Above all, I wonder why? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 02:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
Quote:Also, Endie is a certified goodposter, he makes good posts. Sometimes making good posts means massaging the text to get the reaction(s) you want. Remember that these "internal" updates aren't leaked, we send them to evenews24, kugu, SA, etc., ourselves. Good. Reaction. Achieved.
Quote:Quote:Why so much interest in the topic? Have I really pissed someone off that much? (maybe I'd make a great Goon??) I take no solice, I think it's just sad that Goons have to do what they're doing to sabotage this topic. Above all, I wonder why? It is hilarious. One goon sees a funny thread, and mentions it in chat. Other goons go look, because we like funny threads. And we love attention. <3 Thanks. My dastardly plan has been thwarted. I was really hoping my post would sneak under your radar.
Hey... errmmm..... thanks too. You guys have actually been a big help. Really. 
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
139
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 02:56:00 -
[35] - Quote
GÖ½GÖ¬ The chances of anything smart coming from Goons Is a million to one he said The chances of anything smart coming from Goons Is a million to one.....
But still theey come...... GÖ½GÖ¬ Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
140
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 03:50:00 -
[36] - Quote
Quote:If everyone jumped to conclusions like this ****** OP people would be calling INS on every Mexican they see walking down the street in Arizona as an illegal alien. Me. A redneck. lawlz....
This might even be funny....
If I lived in the US.
But alas, I live in Australia dude.
Our sheep have 4 legs. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
140
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 03:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
Spineker wrote:The Apostle wrote:Quote:If everyone jumped to conclusions like this ****** OP people would be calling INS on every Mexican they see walking down the street in Arizona as an illegal alien. Me. A redneck. lawlz.... This might even be funny.... If I lived in the US. But alas, I live in Australia dude. Our sheep have 4 legs. Or fools have two. Ouch that hurt and you're not even a Goon!  Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
140
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 04:03:00 -
[38] - Quote
Woot. Zag. \o/
Getting serious is it bro?
Now The Mittani is calling on pet CEO's to obfuscate the post.
I am honored.
As you were.
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
140
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 04:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Quote:Penif alt detected. I'm new here. What is this?
He's wrong but I want to know why he is wrong.
EDIT: I did a Google search and got this.
"altPeni*.com - News and research on men's reproductive health, peni* problems, STDs and sexual wellbeing."
Was this it? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
140
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 04:55:00 -
[40] - Quote
Headerman wrote:The Apostle wrote:Quote:Penif alt detected. I'm new here. What is this? He's wrong but I want to know why he is wrong. EDIT: I did a Google search and got this. "altPeni*.com - News and research on men's reproductive health, peni* problems, STDs and sexual wellbeing." Was this it? He means Penifsmash, a dood in PL Cough. Ohhh.... I'm honored I think (are PL good?)
But alas, I'm not.
Is PL recruting? Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |

The Apostle
The Black Priests
142
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 08:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
Quote:Just stopping by this horrible thread to point out that the report bot function is anonymous to users and doesn't send a little flag to to the ceo or anything ok well later gator. This much we worked out on our own. Thank you for sharing. Perhaps have a chat with Endie and explain it to him for his next erudite explanation of Goon policy.
He MISSED that bit.....
Oh sorry. You're CSM!!!!! Been told to clarify your stance have we?!
Quote:This thread is glorious. Scarlet!! Sweetheart. WHAT took you sooooo long?
I did a thing.
Just for you.
And you failed me. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo! |
| |
|